University of SaskatchewaneCommons
  • Browse
    • All of eCommons
    • Communities & Collections
    • By Issue Date
    • Authors
    • Titles
    • Subjects
    • This Collection
    • By Issue Date
    • Authors
    • Titles
    • Subjects
  • My Account
    • Login
    • Register
        • Login
        View Item 
        • eCommons Home
        • College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies
        • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
        • View Item
        • eCommons Home
        • College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies
        • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Immigration and refugee protection act : balancing individual rights and national security

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        garritty_s.pdf (802.3Kb)
        Date
        2008
        Author
        Garritty, Shane Francis
        Type
        Thesis
        Degree Level
        Masters
        Abstract
        Early in 2001 the federal government tabled Bill C-11, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), new comprehensive legislation intended to overhaul Canada’s immigration laws. By this time, refugees had become singled out above other classes of immigrants as a threat to Canadian national security because a backlog of applicants had permitted thousands of failed refugee claimants to remain in Canada and allowed a small number of undesirable individuals to commit serious crimes and to plan and support terrorist activities. This led to public concern that refugees were a potential threat to public safety, national security, and even Canada-US relations. As a result, there were calls for Canada to tighten up its refugee system by adopting a more restrictive adjudication process for refugee claims. At the same time, there were calls for Canada to maintain a fair and open refugee system. This thesis uses discussions from parliamentary committees, an ethical analysis of the right of liberal states to exert sovereignty at the expense of their obligation to protect refugees, and key provisions in both the 1976 Immigration Acts and IRPA, to compare how the two important public goods discussed above, the rights of refugees and the need to protect national security, were balanced in the IRPA. Three major research questions guide this analysis: What provided the impetus for extra legal and security provisions in the IRPA related to refugees? Did amendments in the IRPA constitute a fundamental change to Canada’s refugee determination system? Did the IRPA strike a right balance between safeguarding the rights of refugees and safeguarding national security? These questions represent key elements of the refugee/ security nexus, a problem that the IRPA was designed to address. My thesis finds that for the most part the IRPA provided a balanced legislative response to this problem and that it protected the rights of refugees and moderately enhanced provisions related to public safety and national security, although for the latter it did not constitute a marked improvement, nor for the former did it address the outstanding issue of security certificates. But these two deficiencies in the IRPA serve to highlight the inherent tension Canada has had enacting security measures while maintaining fundamental rights for refugees in a changing geo-political environment.
        Degree
        Master of Arts (M.A.)
        Department
        Political Studies
        Program
        Political Studies
        Supervisor
        Garcea, Joseph
        Copyright Date
        2008
        URI
        http://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-04292008-221725
        Subject
        Canada
        Refugees
        Security
        Collections
        • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
        • College of Graduate Studies & Research
        • University Library
        University of Saskatchewan

        © University of Saskatchewan
        Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy