University of SaskatchewaneCommons
  • Browse
    • All of eCommons
    • Communities & Collections
    • By Issue Date
    • Authors
    • Titles
    • Subjects
    • This Collection
    • By Issue Date
    • Authors
    • Titles
    • Subjects
  • My Account
    • Login
    • Register
        • Login
        View Item 
        • eCommons Home
        • College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies
        • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
        • View Item
        • eCommons Home
        • College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies
        • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Civilizing (the) Chiefs : Islam and Indirect Rule in the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast

        Thumbnail
        View/Open
        KAYE-THESIS.pdf (2.707Mb)
        Tony Kaye-Thesis title page-2011.pdf (44.97Kb)
        Tony Kaye-Thesis front matter-2011.pdf (67.25Kb)
        Date
        2011-10-05
        Author
        Kaye, Tony
        Type
        Thesis
        Degree Level
        Masters
        Abstract
        British colonizers relied on chieftaincies as civilizing partners to implement indirect rule in the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast. A major explanation for the British preference for chieftaincies surrounds how colonizers interpreted recent decades of Muslim intermarriage in the savannah. The arrival of Muslim chiefs to the savannah produced a handful of chiefly led communities. These relatively few groups had loose cultural similarities with European society. The British interpreted the commonalities as signs of human progress in the savannah. Conversely, the British rejected the African communities without Islamic traditions because they did not have recognizable or centralized forms of political leadership. Furthermore, depicting non-chiefly groups as wildly different from European society reinforced the modern and progressive identity of Britain while simultaneously representing non-chiefly groups of the protectorate as socially static or infantile. Believing in the superiority of Muslim-based chieftaincies and the inferiority of non-chiefly groups reflected the Orientalist literary depiction the British began in travel and diplomatic correspondence from and about the savannah. This early intelligence gathering from the nineteenth century produced vivid judgments about the relative value of chiefly and non-chiefly communities for colonizers. The British saw the existence of Muslim-derived chieftaincies as proof that Africans required outside intervention to experience change. Consequently, the view justified British imposition and the civilizing mission. This thesis examines a variety of interlocking British documents—travel and diplomatic literature, colonial administrative reporting, and early anthropological studies—to highlight the positive British discourse representing chiefly groups of the Northern Territories.
        Degree
        Master of Arts (M.A.)
        Department
        History
        Program
        History
        Supervisor
        Handy, Jim; Horwitz, Simonne
        Committee
        Kitzan, Lawrence; Steeves, Jeffery
        Copyright Date
        August 2011
        URI
        http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2011-08-127
        Subject
        Colonialism
        Civilizing Mission
        Islam
        Modernity
        Ghanaian History
        Chieftaincy
        Collections
        • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
        • College of Graduate Studies & Research
        • University Library
        University of Saskatchewan

        © University of Saskatchewan
        Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy